Inductance

We finally dive into inductance — kicking things off with mutual inductance, Biot-Savart, and even pulling in the vector potential to tie it all together!

Doosan Encyclopedia —

Inductance: A quantity representing the ratio of the back-EMF generated by electromagnetic induction due to changes in the current flowing through a circuit, with the unit H (Henry). It is divided into self-inductance and mutual inductance depending on the cause of the magnetic flux change.

It’s the same as what we’ve done so far, and I think now is the stage right before we properly bring coils into circuits. And since we did Faraday’s law hehehe it’s about time to tackle inductance~! So let’s start with mutual inductance (since it’s similar to problems we did before).

Mutual inductance

Equation from the original notes

If there’s just a wire sitting above loop 1 like that, due to the magnetic flux created by $I_1$ of loop 1, a flux passes through loop 2.

Equation from the original notes

Equation from the original notes

The magnetic field $B$ at the red dot can be calculated like that using the Biot-Savart law.

Equation from the original notes

So the sum of $B$ at all the points~~ inside loop 2 is the flux passing through loop 2.

Equation from the original notes

I’ll yank I_1 out of the brackets whoosh!!!!

Equation from the original notes

So this red part here!!! As a proportionality constant, it’s called “mutual inductance”.

By the way, do you remember the “vector potential” we did before?

I’m gonna bring that out and use it!!! If I bring B = \nabla \times A in and use it!!!!

Equation from the original notes

<According to the content in chapter 4 earlier, the vector potential at a point a relative-r away from a $dl$ where current flows is>

Equation from the original notes

If I apply this equation to the one above too,

Equation from the original notes

You can also view mutual inductance like the above.

As you can see, mutual inductance has nothing to do with the magnitude of currents like $I_1$, $I_2$, and things like the length and shape of the wires, the position of the two wires, etc. are what determine its value.

And accordingly (geometrically) the flux gets determined……… heh heh you got the feel right?

This is called the “Neumann formula”. But apparently it’s not that useful?? hehe huh?? hehe

Alright, and while writing out that equation I caught on to something — what if a current equal in magnitude to the $I_1$ from just now flows through loop 2??

The mutual inductance values between them would be the same, right?

Equation from the original notes

Like this??

Self-inductance

Alright so now, let’s gently~gently~ change the current flowing through loop 1. The magnetic flux would also change gently~gently~, right?? So first, because current flows in loop 1, the amount of flux passing through loop 2 is

Equation from the original notes

Now at last a current flows in loop 2 too!! Once a current is created in loop 2, a magnetic field is created by it and again affects loop 1. And to create yet another magnetic field in the direction that blocks that field, an EMF is created again!!

How much EMF will be created?!?!? In other words, how much magnetic flux does it need to create!?!?!

As we saw a moment ago, if the rate of change of the $I$ it’s flowing is big, it’ll have to create a big EMF.

Equation from the original notes

The proportionality constant $L$ here is exactly what self-inductance is!!!!

(You probably just just-just-just-just’d through this when dealing with circuits, right? hehehe hehe now you know what it means)

The RL circuit PPT

Hmm and for this posting I’m going to upload the PPT I used when I did a presentation on RL circuits during the semester hehehehe I hope it helps.

(While preparing on this RL circuit, I looked at this part of the study a lot hehehe so I think it’ll probably help you understand… hehe)

Equation from the original notes

Equation from the original notes

Equation from the original notes

Equation from the original notes

Equation from the original notes

Equation from the original notes

Equation from the original notes

Equation from the original notes

Equation from the original notes

Equation from the original notes

Equation from the original notes

Equation from the original notes

Equation from the original notes


Heads-up. The figures here are the original notes, slips and all. A few things to watch for:

  • In the Biot-Savart formula for $B_1$, the current is missing: $B_1 = \frac{\mu_0 I_1}{4\pi}\oint \frac{d\vec l_1 \times \hat{\eta}}{\eta^2}$.
  • In the solenoid slide, the flux line should end in $\mu_0 n^2 (UA)\,i \equiv Li$ (the current $i$ is missing), and the last line should read $\varepsilon = -\frac{d\Phi}{dt} = -\frac{d}{dt}(Li) = -L\frac{di}{dt}$: the slide writes $dx$ for $dt$ and drops the minus sign of Faraday’s law.
  • In the complex-form RL slide, the inductor voltage is $V_L = L\frac{dI}{dt} = i\omega L\,I e^{i(\omega t+\phi)}$; the slide drops the $I$ there, and the next line has it back.
  • In the integrator and differentiator slides, the last step is an approximation: replacing $V_L$ by $V_{supply}$ needs $\omega L \gg R$, and replacing $V_R$ by $V_{supply}$ needs $\omega L \ll R$.

Comments

Discussion happens via GitHub Discussions. You'll need a GitHub account to comment.