Frequency Dependence of the Permittivity

Turns out permittivity isn't just a constant — it changes with frequency, and we dig into why using a good ol' spring-mass atomic model instead of scary orbitals.

Alright. Up until now it was “monochromatic,” so we didn’t need to worry about this thing called “dispersion.”

From here on it’s “monochromatic nope nope, multi-color yes yes.”

First let’s look at the refractive index.

What is the refractive index???

“How different is the speed here from the speed in vacuum~~~?”

that is

n=c/v

but

equation

therefore

equation

(Here c is of course a constant, and f is also a constant!?!?!!! n is a function of the wavelength lambda….)

And let me write “how different from the speed of light~~” from this perspective

equation

Using this

equation

And applying the assumption we made before, “permeability is about the same everywhere~~~,”

equation

That is, the relative refractive index is a function of the wavelength lambda~

Well, roughly this sort of conclusion can be drawn.

Huh?!? Permittivity depends on the wave’s wavelength lambda?!?!?

Welp…. yeah…. well, apparently so.. T_T

Okay, then why!!!! why!!!??? does the permittivity epsilon of a dielectric change with frequency

Above, mathematically, that’s how it comes out,,,,, hmm,,, when we do it with formulas like that, there’s nothing to say,

so then what on earth is happening inside the atom that yields such a conclusion — time to think about that

That, if anything, could be said to be the purpose of this posting…lol

Alright then

What does the inside of an atom look like anyway??

Hmm~~~~

Orbital~!!!!

if you say that, you’ll get cancer now lolololol let’s avoid cancer

Let’s think with an easier, simpler model!!!!

A classical orbital model??? Not that, just

like this

Alright so now let’s arrange it in a shape that’s convenient for us to calculate,

and let’s draw in the axes too

< too lazy to draw it myself, excerpted →→ >

Explaining things with a spring system — in mechanics,

electric circuits, and so on there are tons of them, I’m sick of it,,,,, and here it shows up too -_- agh!!!!

Anyway, the forces the electron receives are, first,

the restoring force

equation

the electric force due to the electric field

equation

and there’s also a damping force

equation

(let’s not worry about the cause here)

equation

equation

It’s exactly the thing we covered in the differential equations special posting!!

Let’s extend the cosine on the right-hand side to a complex exponential, and call it the ‘real part.’

equation

If we solve this and say ’the real part of that solution is it!’, we can say we’ve found the real solution.

Ayy, this one we’re good at, y’know~

Particular solution

equation

Gott it

equation

equation

plug in, let’s go

equation

Now then x as a function of t is

equation

it’s saying that it oscillates like thiiiis, and that means the electron is moving like this!!

Since the electric dipole moment is qd!!

equation

Now what this equation means is,,,,,,,,,,,,

it means that a phase difference arises between p (electric dipole moment) and E.

(In a way, isn’t that obvious? Since p is generated by E, it’s obvious that a time lag shows up…?? lol)

If we move the imaginary part scattered around in the equation up into the numerator and express it as an exponential, it seems we could figure out the phase difference Φ.

But we’re smart, so just by glaring at that thing we can figure out the phase difference in one shot, right?!?!!!

equation

equation

But……….. usually depending on where the electron is in the molecule, or where it is within the electron [shells], at each of those positions

the natural frequency is different, the damping constant gamma is different,….. apparently.

So,

equation

electrons like this,

equation

there are this many, and let’s say per unit volume there are N of them.

Each and every single one of ’em — each-each-each — all~~ have to be added up, so…

equation

Can’t we write it like this??

That blue one there is called the “complex susceptibility”

equation

and apparently it’s notated like this!!!!

In the end,

equation

we can write it this way, so it can be described just like we learned back in Chapter 4~~~ is what it’s saying.

hehehe in Chapter 4 we used the P vector to define a linear medium and defined something called the displacement field — what happens to that?~

Yes, that too is prepared.

equation

Ah…. if I take this in a kind of elementary-schooler way,

all~~~~~~~~~~ of the equations from every conclusion up until now — just draw a tilde ~ on top of their heads and you’re done!!!

That is, the wave equation here inside the dielectric

equation

can be written like this~~ is what it’s saying.

equation

The solution of this 2nd-order differential equation is

equation

this is the solution

huh?!?! it’s the same as the solution of the wave equation inside a conductor!?!! (only the conductivity sigma would be 0, right?)

So

equation

we get

equation

eughhh~~ exactly!!! the same as in a conductor~ how can they be so alike?

Alright so the gist is ‘inside a dielectric too, absorption of energy occurs’

And also, it’s true that if the frequency is large, the refractive index becomes large!!

I think this is what we’ve examined at a somewhat smaller scale.

With this, I’ll end Chapter 9.

I felt that studying waveguides with the Griffiths electromagnetism book would be too much, so I’ll boldly skip it.

Honestly, I also feel like I haven’t understood it enough to explain it myself.

So the next posting will be Chapter 10

And I have some of the Chapter 9 exercises that I’ve solved — those I’ll put up all at once at the very end of the postings!!!lol


Originally written in Korean on my Naver blog (2015-08). Translated to English for gdpark.blog.