Endogenous and Exogenous Variables

Quick housekeeping before we dive in: I want to lay out endogenous vs. exogenous variables.

You know how the maps we actually use don’t show every single thing in the world? They strip it down to the important stuff — roads, rivers, cities — and just… ignore everything else.

Turns out economics is exactly like that. You keep the minimum number of variables you absolutely need, and everything else? Gone.

Reminds me of Einstein:

(Mache die Dinge so einfach wie möglich — aber nicht einfacher)

— Make things as simple as possible, but not simpler.

— As simple as possible. Just not any simpler.

Hits, right?!!

(Or another way to say it: you assume a ridiculously~~~ simple model, analyze the heck out of it, and then add a couple of variables and slowly expand it from there.)

OK so — once economists have stripped things down to the bare minimum, what do they do next?

They split those variables into endogenous variables and exogenous variables!

So what on earth are endogenous and exogenous variables?!!!

Example. Let’s say we’re studying GD park’s “exam scores.”

Most people’s first instinct would be to take “study hours” as the direct variable, right?

Let’s throw it on a coordinate plane real quick —

I mean — say what you will, but I am at least a human being, so the more I study, the higher my exam scores should turn out. Right???

(The reason I drew it concave is just my personal philosophy on studying, lol lol lol — don’t read too hard into it.. hehe.)

OK so — are we done with the analysis?!?!?! Nope, not even close.

Let’s also think about the other (meaningful) factors.

Like — let’s say a girlfriend appears.

Studying 2 hours with no girlfriend vs. studying 2 hours with a girlfriend — let’s say there’s a difference in efficiency!!!!

No girlfriend? Eh, kinda meh.

But with a girlfriend you can study happy, so for the same number of hours the efficiency shoots way~~ up, and you get higher grades.

So compared to the original data, the score is now higher — the point needs to sit up here.

But hold on — would it really make sense if it only jumped up by h at the 2-hour mark?

No matter how many hours you study, the boost should be the same h.

So the new function should look like the blue line — when a girlfriend appears, the curve parallel-shifts upward by h.

And conversely, you could think about when a cancerous lump of a girlfriend appears.

(In that case, you’d draw a curve parallel-shifted downward by h, obviously.)

Or as my income goes up (part-time raises, allowance bumps, all that…) the study efficiency could go up or down too…

OK. Here’s what I was actually trying to get at —

“Study hours” is what we call the endogenous variable in this model.

The other factors — girlfriend, income, all that — the variables that live outside the model — those are the exogenous variables.

Getting a bit of a feel for it??!?! Or was the example kinda weak —

lol lol lol lol lol lol

Should I have gone with something more extreme lmao

lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol — anyway!!! heheheh heh heh.

This is probably stuff everyone already~ knows, so I kind of banged it out — just enjoy it if you do, and that’s enough for me.

P.S.

Did you know?

I converted all my blog posts to PDF and I’m selling them as a PDF bundle :-)

https://blog.naver.com/gdpresent/222243102313

Blog post PDF (ver.2.0) sale (Physics I studied, Finance I studied)

Purchase info below ~ Hello! If there are parts of the blog posts you find unsatisfying, or too much over…

blog.naver.com

Originally written in Korean on my Naver blog (2016-07). Translated to English for gdpark.blog.