WKB Quantization Practice: Two Turning Points, a Hard Wall, and a Logarithmic Potential

Three worked WKB quantization problems: the two-turning-point condition, the harmonic oscillator and half-oscillator, and the radial logarithmic potential.

This post puts the WKB connection formulas from the previous chapter to work. We will first recover the quantization rule for a well with two smooth turning points, then apply the same reasoning to a harmonic oscillator, a half-oscillator with one hard wall, and a radial logarithmic potential.

The notation used throughout is

$$ p(x)=\sqrt{2m\,[E-V(x)]} $$

in a classically allowed region. WKB is reliable where the potential varies slowly on the scale of the local de Broglie wavelength; the connection formulas handle the immediate neighborhoods of simple turning points.

Matching across two turning points

Begin with one smooth turning point at $x_2$. The region to its left is classically allowed and the region to its right is forbidden.

A smooth turning point at x2, with a classically allowed bound-state region on the left and a tunneling region on the right

The connection formula for a solution that decays to the right is shown below.

WKB connection formula at the right turning point x2: an oscillatory sine for x below x2 matched to a decaying exponential for x above x2

Nothing special depends on placing the turning point at the origin; the integration limit simply changes to $x_2$. If the allowed region lies on the other side, reverse the orientation of the connection formula.

A reversed smooth turning point, with the tunneling region on the left and the bound-state region on the right

Reversed WKB connection formula at x2: a decaying exponential to the left and an oscillatory sine to the right

The connection formula is not an arbitrary mnemonic. It follows by replacing the potential with its linear approximation near the turning point, solving the resulting Airy equation, and matching the Airy asymptotics to the WKB forms. Here we will use that result rather than repeat the proof.

Now consider a bound state between two smooth turning points $x_1$ and $x_2$.

A potential well with energy E crossing the potential at the two turning points x1 and x2

Matching from the right turning point gives one representation of the wavefunction in $x_1 < x < x_2$:

Allowed-region WKB wavefunction written by integrating from x to the right turning point x2

Matching from the left turning point gives another:

Allowed-region WKB wavefunction written by integrating from the left turning point x1 to x

These are not two independent physical states. They must describe the same wavefunction throughout the well. More precisely, their phases must be compatible up to the periodicity and reflection identities of the sine, while their normalization constants must be chosen consistently. Merely saying that the phases can differ by an arbitrary multiple of $\pi$ is incomplete because $\sin A=\sin B$ also has the reflected branch $A=\pi-B+2k\pi$.

Using $\sin z=-\sin(-z)$ to put both expressions in a common form produces the intermediate steps below.

Phase matching of the left- and right-turning-point WKB solutions, using the oddness of sine

Combining the two action integrals gives the bound-state condition

$$ \int_{x_1}^{x_2}p(x)\,dx=\left(n-\frac12\right)\pi\hbar, \qquad n=1,2,3,\ldots $$

Combination of the two phase integrals into the WKB quantization condition between x1 and x2

If the levels are instead numbered from $n=0$, the same result is more commonly written as

$$ \int_{x_1}^{x_2}p(x)\,dx=\left(n+\frac12\right)\pi\hbar. $$

This is the Bohr–Sommerfeld quantization rule with the two turning-point phase shifts included.

Practice problem 1: harmonic oscillator

Use WKB to find the allowed energies of

$$ V(x)=\frac12m\omega^2x^2. $$

Parabolic harmonic-oscillator potential with energy E and symmetric turning points at minus x2 and x2

For two smooth turning points, the quantization condition is

Two-turning-point WKB action integral equal to n minus one-half times pi hbar

The turning points are symmetric, $x_1=-x_2$, and satisfy

$$ E=\frac12m\omega^2x_2^2. $$

Harmonic-oscillator energy expressed at both symmetric turning points

Inside the allowed region,

$$ p(x)=\sqrt{2m\left(E-\frac12m\omega^2x^2\right)} =m\omega\sqrt{x_2^2-x^2}. $$

Derivation of the harmonic-oscillator classical momentum in terms of the turning point x2

Symmetry changes the action integral to an integral from $-x_2$ to $x_2$.

Use of x1 equals minus x2 to rewrite the harmonic-oscillator action integral symmetrically

The needed antiderivative is the familiar semicircle integral.

Integral-table identity for the antiderivative of the square root of a squared constant minus x squared

Evaluating at the limits gives

$$ \int_{-x_2}^{x_2}m\omega\sqrt{x_2^2-x^2}\,dx =\frac{\pi E}{\omega}. $$

Evaluation of the harmonic-oscillator action and the resulting WKB energy E equals n minus one-half times hbar omega

Therefore

$$ E_n=\left(n-\frac12\right)\hbar\omega, \qquad n=1,2,3,\ldots $$

or $E_n=(n+\tfrac12)\hbar\omega$ when numbering starts at zero. For the harmonic oscillator the leading WKB rule happens to reproduce the exact spectrum.

Practice problem 2: one hard wall and one smooth turning point

Next put an infinite wall at $x=0$ and retain the harmonic potential for $x>0$. The wavefunction must vanish at the wall, while $x_2$ remains a smooth turning point.

Half-harmonic-oscillator potential with an infinite wall at x equals zero and a smooth turning point x2

Matching at $x_2$ gives the allowed-region WKB form

Allowed-region WKB wavefunction for a well ending at the smooth turning point x2

and the hard-wall condition $\psi(0)=0$ requires the sine phase at $x=0$ to be an integer multiple of $\pi$. Thus

$$ \int_0^{x_2}p(x)\,dx=\left(n-\frac14\right)\pi\hbar, \qquad n=1,2,3,\ldots $$

Derivation of the one-hard-wall WKB quantization rule with the one-quarter phase shift

The momentum and turning-point relation are the same as before.

Half-oscillator momentum written as m omega times the square root of x2 squared minus x squared

Half-oscillator action integral from the hard wall at zero to the turning point x2

Using the quarter-circle integral

Integral-table identity used to evaluate the half-oscillator action

gives

$$ \int_0^{x_2}m\omega\sqrt{x_2^2-x^2}\,dx =\frac{\pi E}{2\omega}. $$

Historical half-oscillator calculation; its displayed upper-bound inverse-sine argument minus one is a typo and must be plus one

Source correction: In the preserved historical raster above, the upper endpoint is written as $\sin^{-1}(-1)$. Because $x'=x_2$ there, the argument must be $+1$, so this line should read $\sin^{-1}(1)=\pi/2$. The adjacent native TeX and the final action $\pi E/(2\omega)$ retain the corrected result.

The spectrum is therefore

$$ E_n=2\left(n-\frac14\right)\hbar\omega =\left(2n-\frac12\right)\hbar\omega, \qquad n=1,2,3,\ldots $$

Half-oscillator energies three-halves, seven-halves, eleven-halves, and higher multiples of hbar omega

These are $3\hbar\omega/2,7\hbar\omega/2,11\hbar\omega/2,\ldots$. They are precisely the odd-parity levels of the full oscillator, because only odd oscillator wavefunctions vanish at the origin.

Practice problem 3: radial logarithmic potential

For an $l=0$ state in a spherically symmetric potential, write the reduced radial wavefunction as $u(r)=rR(r)$. Its boundary condition is $u(0)=0$, so the origin acts like a hard boundary for the one-dimensional radial problem. With one smooth outer turning point $r_0$, the WKB rule used here is

Radial WKB quantization integral from zero to r0 with a one-quarter phase shift

Consider

$$ V(r)=V_0\ln\frac{r}{a}. $$

Logarithmic radial potential V of r equals V0 times the logarithm of r over a

At the turning point, $E=V(r_0)=V_0\ln(r_0/a)$. Hence

$$ E-V(r)=V_0\ln\frac{r_0}{r}, $$

and the action becomes

$$ \int_0^{r_0}\sqrt{2mV_0\ln\frac{r_0}{r}}\,dr. $$

Radial action for the logarithmic potential after substituting the turning-point energy

Set $x=\ln(r_0/r)$, so $r=r_0e^{-x}$ and $dr=-r_0e^{-x}dx$. As $r$ runs from $0$ to $r_0$, $x$ runs from $\infty$ to $0$.

Substitution x equals the logarithm of r0 over r and the transformed radial integration limits

The remaining integral is a Gamma-function integral:

$$ \int_0^\infty x^{1/2}e^{-x}\,dx =\Gamma\!\left(\frac32\right) =\frac{\sqrt\pi}{2}. $$

Gamma-function evaluation of the transformed logarithmic-potential action integral

Therefore

$$ r_0=\sqrt{\frac{2\pi}{mV_0}}\left(n-\frac14\right)\hbar $$

and

$$ E_n =V_0\ln\!\left[ \sqrt{\frac{2\pi}{mV_0}} \left(n-\frac14\right)\frac{\hbar}{a} \right]. $$

Solution for the turning radius r0 and the WKB energy levels of the logarithmic potential

Taking the difference of adjacent levels cancels every mass-dependent factor:

$$ E_{n+1}-E_n =V_0\ln\!\left(\frac{4n+3}{4n-1}\right). $$

Historical adjacent-level calculation; its displayed E n factor four n minus three over four is a typo and must be four n minus one over four

Source correction: In the preserved historical raster above, the displayed $E_n$ factor $(4n-3)/4$ is a typo. Consistency with $n-\tfrac14$ requires $(4n-1)/4$. The adjacent native TeX retains the corrected levels and the correct spacing $V_0\ln[(4n+3)/(4n-1)]$.

The conclusion is that the spacing is independent of the particle mass, not that it is constant: the logarithm still makes the spacing depend on $n$. Also, because the logarithmic potential is singular at the origin, this result should be understood as the stated radial WKB approximation with the boundary phase built in, not as a claim that ordinary WKB remains uniformly valid all the way to $r=0$.

Takeaway

The phase correction depends on the kind of boundary encountered:

  • two smooth turning points give a total half-integer shift;
  • one hard wall plus one smooth turning point gives the quarter-shift rule used above;
  • changing the potential changes the action integral, but the matching logic remains the same.

The historical raster equations and diagrams are preserved in this edition. The surrounding text supplies searchable equations, definitions, indexing conventions, and the scientific qualifications that were only implicit in the original notes.

Original Korean post: WKB approximation practice problems — Quantum Mechanics I Studied #37.

Comments

Discussion happens via GitHub Discussions. You'll need a GitHub account to comment.