Joule Coefficient and Joule Expansion of an Ideal Gas

Starting from the age-old puzzle of how to make things cold, we dig into Joule expansion: ideal gases keep their temperature, while attraction-dominated gases can cool!

Suppose you’ve been given an assignment to heat something up. You need to make some object hot. Then how would you make it hot??

You’d head straight for a lighter or a gas stove without hesitation, right? And if you don’t even have those, you’d do it like the first humans did: rub wood against wood and start a fire with the heat of friction. It was like that in the old days and it’s like that now: (unless we’re talking ultra-high temperatures) you use fire to heat up whatever you want to make hot.

Now then, back in modern times, what if you wanted to make some object “cold”???

How are you going to do it?? Leave it outside?? That just means you’ll let it come into thermal equilibrium at room temperature, 25°C, so what are you going to do when you want to cool it below 25°C?? You’ll use a refrigerator?!?!

Hmm… the refrigerator is probably the product of the question “how do we make things cold?” That is, to the question we’re asking now, “how are we going to make things cold?”, the right answer would be “I’ll build this thing called a refrigerator, blah blah blah!”

Is it starting to click now??? Since olden times, making an object hot (unless it’s ultra-high temperature) was never hard. But making something cold wasn’t easy back then and isn’t easy now. So the topic of this post is “cooling.”

Alright, first we’ll look at the Joule expansion of a gas. Not the Joule expansion of an ideal gas, but the Joule expansion of a real gas, because unlike the ideal-gas case, the Joule expansion of a real gas has to do with ‘cooling.’ First, then, let’s look at Joule expansion.

Joule expansion setup: two insulated boxes joined by a neck that a pin keeps shut; a particle (blue path) bounces around the left box, the right box is empty, and heat Q just bounces off the walls

For starters, another name for Joule expansion was ‘free expansion.’ And no energy of any kind going into or out of the system is an assumption that’s already built in. Letting the gas freely (‘irreversibly’) expand into the connected space on the other side, which is a vacuum, is what we called Joule expansion, and we covered it a while back: Free Expansion (Joule Expansion) and Entropy of Mixing (Thermal & Statistical Mechanics I Studied #24). Last time we talked about entropy; today we’re talking about temperature. Here we go.

In the figure above, some particle, the one marked with the blue arrow lol, was moving with velocity $v$, and even if the pin thingy splitting the two spaces opens and it crosses over to the other side,

The pin is open: the particle’s path (blue, then green) carries on into the right box

is there any room for its velocity to suddenly change from $v$ to $v'$?!?! There’s no such room anywhere. That is, U = ½m⟨v²⟩, and $U$ doesn’t change.

But the internal energy $U$ of an ideal gas (per molecule, for a monatomic gas) is U = (3/2)k_BT, so it depends only on the temperature $T$.

That is!!! When an ideal gas undergoes Joule expansion, its temperature doesn’t change.

But real gases are different.

The same setup with the pin open: the particle’s path carries on into the right box

Take a particle that was moving with $v$ in the closed-off space V₀: once the pin opens and it crosses over and sails around on the other side, there IS room for its velocity to change from $v$ to $v'$!!! Why?!?! Because real gases take into account the potential energy that we ignored for the ideal gas.

Alright, alright, alright!

The insulated container: heat Q bounces off the walls of both boxes, so no energy gets in or out

Since we’re thinking inside an insulated container like this, the internal energy $U$ still doesn’t change.

(You can also think of it as ‘Joule expansion is changing $V$ while keeping $U$ fixed.’)

But in

U = KE + PE, with U circled and marked fixed and PE underlined

since

The potential energy of an attracting pair, electric or gravitational (−G m₁m₂/r): as r grows (orange arrows), PE goes up (blue arrow)

we get

U (fixed) = KE + PE: PE goes up, so KE goes down

KE ↓ means the temperature goes ↓, so an attraction-dominated gas like this can get colder when it Joule-expands!!! That is not a universal rule for every real gas or every state.

So Joule expansion can indeed give us cooling when the interactions make the Joule coefficient negative.

Now let’s tidy this up in a more physics-y way. We’re going to define something called the Joule coefficient, $\mu_J$.

The Joule coefficient: μ_J = (∂T/∂V)_U

That’s the definition, and you can read its meaning like this.

The meaning of μ_J = (∂T/∂V)_U: 1. change the volume with the internal energy held constant, i.e. a Joule expansion; 2. how much does the temperature change?

Now, how are we going to analyze this?

We’re going to use the ‘math’ we used way, way back. Do you remember the “reciprocity theorem”? The reason we’re allowed to use it is right here: Reciprocal Theorem and Reciprocity Theorem (Thermal & Statistical Mechanics I Studied #23). Then let’s get into the analysis.

The reciprocity theorem (∂x/∂y)_z(∂y/∂z)_x(∂z/∂x)_y = −1 with x = T, y = V, z = U: (∂T/∂V)_U(∂V/∂U)_T(∂U/∂T)_V = −1, with the Joule coefficient in red, so μ_J = −1/((∂V/∂U)_T(∂U/∂T)_V)

For anyone who forgot why the blue part is $C_V$: $(\partial U/\partial T)_V$ is exactly the heat capacity at constant volume, $C_V$.

So μ_J = −(1/C_V)·1/(∂V/∂U)_T = −(1/C_V)(∂U/∂V)_T

That’s as far as we’ve got. Now I’d like that one remaining derivative to be written in terms of state functions we use all the time.

From dU = TdS − pdV: (∂U/∂V)_T = T(∂S/∂V)_T − p, and by a Maxwell relation the green part becomes (∂p/∂T)_V, so (∂U/∂V)_T = T(∂p/∂T)_V − p

Plugged into the Joule coefficient: μ_J = −(1/C_V)(T(∂p/∂T)_V − p)

Let’s see what value $\mu_J$ takes for an ideal gas. To keep it simple, let’s say we have 1 mol of an ideal gas.

Ideal gas, 1 mol: pV = RT, so p = RT/V and (∂p/∂T)_V = R/V; then T(∂p/∂T)_V − p = RT/V − RT/V = 0, so μ_J = 0

A very obvious conclusion has come out. The Joule coefficient being 0 means

A zero Joule coefficient, μ_J = (∂T/∂V)_U = 0: in a Joule expansion, the temperature change is zero

It’s the same conclusion we guessed by intuition way~ back at the start, so that feels good.

Then now, setting the ideal gas aside, let’s look at what value the Joule coefficient takes for a van der Waals gas, which is a bit closer to a real gas.

For 1 mol of a van der Waals gas,

Van der Waals gas, 1 mol: (p + a/V²)(V − b) = RT, so p = RT/(V − b) − a/V² and (∂p/∂T)_V = R/(V − b); then T(∂p/∂T)_V − p = a/V², so μ_J = −(1/C_V)·a/V²

I’ll show this in a practice problem later, but the heat capacity of a van der Waals gas (a monatomic one) is

Heat capacity of a monatomic van der Waals gas, 1 mol: C_V = (3/2)R

so the Joule coefficient is

Joule coefficient of a monatomic van der Waals gas: μ_J = −(2/3R)·a/V², which is negative

The Joule coefficient is negative!!!?!? So it really does cool down @_@

Then how much does it cool?!?!

Temperature change in a Joule expansion: ΔT_J = integral of (∂T/∂V)_U dV from V₁ to V₂

If we write it like this, I think we can state the temperature change due to Joule expansion!!!

For a monatomic van der Waals gas: ΔT_J = integral of −(2/3R)(a/V²) dV from V₁ to V₂ = (2a/3R)(1/V₂ − 1/V₁) = −(2a/3R)(V₂ − V₁)/(V₁V₂)

Since $V_2 \gt V_1$, I wrote it that way on purpose. The quantitative amount of temperature change depends on ‘$a$’, which is to say, it depends on the nature of the particles. Meaning it’s different for each species: H, He, Na, N₂ ······.

<It depends on the attraction between the gas molecules!!! - for a van der Waals gas> lol


Heads-up. The figures here are the original notes, slips and all. A few things to watch for:

  • In the potential-energy picture, the Coulomb energy of two charges is $\frac{kq_1q_2}{r}$; the minus sign there describes an attracting pair of opposite charges, $-\frac{k|q_1q_2|}{r}$.
  • $C_V = \frac{3}{2}R$ is the molar heat capacity of a monatomic gas; in general $\mu_J = -\frac{a}{C_VV^2}$ (a van der Waals gas has the $C_V$ of the ideal gas of its molecules, about $\frac{5}{2}R$ for N₂), so $\mu_J = -\frac{2a}{3RV^2}$ and the $\Delta T_J$ below are for a monatomic gas.
  • Both temperature-change integrals run from $V_1$ to $V_2$ (the pictures write $V_1$ to $V_1$), and the factor $a$ belongs in every line after the first: $\Delta T_J = \frac{2a}{3R}\left(\frac{1}{V_2} - \frac{1}{V_1}\right) = -\frac{2a}{3R}\,\frac{V_2 - V_1}{V_1V_2}$.

Comments

Discussion happens via GitHub Discussions. You'll need a GitHub account to comment.