<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Capital on gdpark.blog</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/tags/capital/</link><description>Recent content in Capital on gdpark.blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://gdpark.blog/tags/capital/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Stylized Facts of Economic Growth [Macroeconomics I Studied #10]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/macroeconomics-10-stylized-facts-of-economic-growth/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/macroeconomics-10-stylized-facts-of-economic-growth/</guid><description>We&amp;rsquo;re finally zooming out to the long run — why do some countries keep winning? Enter Solow&amp;rsquo;s aggregate production function Y = F(K, N), and the real fun begins.</description></item><item><title>The Relationship Between Savings Rate and Output [Macroeconomics I Studied #11]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/macroeconomics-11-the-relationship-between-savings-rate-and-output/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/macroeconomics-11-the-relationship-between-savings-rate-and-output/</guid><description>We dig into how the savings rate connects to capital per person — and why that matters for output, with a quick detour through flow vs. stock.</description></item><item><title>The Cobb-Douglas Production Function [Macroeconomics I Studied #12]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/macroeconomics-12-the-cobb-douglas-production-function/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/macroeconomics-12-the-cobb-douglas-production-function/</guid><description>We finally pin down that vague f(K/N) with the Cobb-Douglas production function and crank through the math to get a concrete steady-state output formula.</description></item><item><title>Isoquants [Microeconomics I Studied #24]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-24-isoquants/</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-24-isoquants/</guid><description>We bring K back into the picture, plot the whole Q = f(L, K) surface in 3D, then slice it to see what isoquants actually are — infinite (L, K) combos that spit out the same output.</description></item><item><title>Isoquants: The Uneconomic Region of Production [Microeconomics I Studied #25]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-25-isoquants-the-uneconomic-region-of-production/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-25-isoquants-the-uneconomic-region-of-production/</guid><description>That weird backward-bending chunk of the isoquant has a name — it&amp;rsquo;s the uneconomic region, and here&amp;rsquo;s exactly why it exists and why no sane firm would ever go there.</description></item></channel></rss>