<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cobb-Douglas on gdpark.blog</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/tags/cobb-douglas/</link><description>Recent content in Cobb-Douglas on gdpark.blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://gdpark.blog/tags/cobb-douglas/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Cobb-Douglas Production Function [Macroeconomics I Studied #12]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/macroeconomics-12-the-cobb-douglas-production-function/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/macroeconomics-12-the-cobb-douglas-production-function/</guid><description>We finally pin down that vague f(K/N) with the Cobb-Douglas production function and crank through the math to get a concrete steady-state output formula.</description></item><item><title>Types of Isoquants: Linear, L-Shaped, and Cobb-Douglas [Microeconomics I Studied #27]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-27-types-of-isoquants-linear-l-shaped-and-cobb-douglas/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-27-types-of-isoquants-linear-l-shaped-and-cobb-douglas/</guid><description>A chill rundown of linear, L-shaped, and Cobb-Douglas isoquants — and why their shapes directly tell you everything about σ, the elasticity of substitution.</description></item><item><title>Returns to Scale [Microeconomics I Studied #28]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-28-returns-to-scale/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-28-returns-to-scale/</guid><description>We dig into the 3D production function to figure out why doubling a factory isn&amp;rsquo;t the same as building a new one — and how increasing, decreasing, and constant returns to scale all shake out.</description></item><item><title>Labor Demand Curve [Microeconomics I Studied #33]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-33-labor-demand-curve/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-33-labor-demand-curve/</guid><description>We derive the labor demand curve by tracing how a firm&amp;rsquo;s optimal labor choice shifts each time the wage ticks up — first with graphs, then with a Cobb-Douglas proof.</description></item><item><title>Untitled [Microeconomics I Studied #37]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-37-long-run-cost-minimization-with-cobb-douglas/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-37-long-run-cost-minimization-with-cobb-douglas/</guid><description>We pin down TC, MC, and AC for a Cobb-Douglas production function and find they all collapse to the same constant α — constant returns to scale is why.</description></item></channel></rss>