<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Grand Canonical Ensemble on gdpark.blog</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/tags/grand-canonical-ensemble/</link><description>Recent content in Grand Canonical Ensemble on gdpark.blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://gdpark.blog/tags/grand-canonical-ensemble/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Grand Canonical Ensemble [Thermal &amp; Statistical Mechanics I Studied #40]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/thermal-statistical-40-the-grand-canonical-ensemble/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/thermal-statistical-40-the-grand-canonical-ensemble/</guid><description>Chapter 22 extends our model to allow particle exchange alongside energy flow, diving into the grand canonical ensemble where both energy and particle number can fluctuate.</description></item><item><title>Grand Potential [Thermal &amp; Statistical Mechanics I Studied #42]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/thermal-statistical-42-grand-potential/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/thermal-statistical-42-grand-potential/</guid><description>We define the grand potential Φ_G = -k_BT·ln(Z_G) by building on how F works in the canonical ensemble — because the partition function holds all the power, hehehe!</description></item><item><title>Chemical Potential of Photons [Thermal &amp; Statistical Mechanics I Studied #45]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/thermal-statistical-45-chemical-potential-of-photons/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/thermal-statistical-45-chemical-potential-of-photons/</guid><description>Turns out when a system doesn&amp;rsquo;t conserve particle number — like photons — the chemical potential just goes to zero at equilibrium, and that&amp;rsquo;s actually a huge deal!!</description></item></channel></rss>