<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hermitian Operators on gdpark.blog</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/tags/hermitian-operators/</link><description>Recent content in Hermitian Operators on gdpark.blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://gdpark.blog/tags/hermitian-operators/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Formalism: Observables and Hermitian Operators [Quantum Mechanics I Studied #15]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/quantum-mechanics-15-formalism-observables-and-hermitian-operators/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/quantum-mechanics-15-formalism-observables-and-hermitian-operators/</guid><description>Why measurement in QM always spits out real numbers — and how that forces every observable to be a Hermitian operator. (Daggers are literally knives, lol.)</description></item><item><title>Formalism: Determinate States [Quantum Mechanics I Studied #16]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/quantum-mechanics-16-formalism-determinate-states/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/quantum-mechanics-16-formalism-determinate-states/</guid><description>Transcribing Griffiths on determinate states — turns out demanding zero standard deviation just pops out the eigenvalue equation, and it all chains together beautifully.</description></item></channel></rss>