<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Labor on gdpark.blog</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/tags/labor/</link><description>Recent content in Labor on gdpark.blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://gdpark.blog/tags/labor/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Average and Marginal Product of Labor [Microeconomics I Studied #23]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-23-average-and-marginal-product-of-labor/</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-23-average-and-marginal-product-of-labor/</guid><description>We flip to the supplier side and dig into how output Q responds to labor L (with K fixed) — including why piling on more workers eventually starts hurting.</description></item><item><title>Isoquants [Microeconomics I Studied #24]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-24-isoquants/</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-24-isoquants/</guid><description>We bring K back into the picture, plot the whole Q = f(L, K) surface in 3D, then slice it to see what isoquants actually are — infinite (L, K) combos that spit out the same output.</description></item><item><title>Isoquants: The Uneconomic Region of Production [Microeconomics I Studied #25]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-25-isoquants-the-uneconomic-region-of-production/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/microeconomics-25-isoquants-the-uneconomic-region-of-production/</guid><description>That weird backward-bending chunk of the isoquant has a name — it&amp;rsquo;s the uneconomic region, and here&amp;rsquo;s exactly why it exists and why no sane firm would ever go there.</description></item></channel></rss>