<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Newton-Raphson on gdpark.blog</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/tags/newton-raphson/</link><description>Recent content in Newton-Raphson on gdpark.blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://gdpark.blog/tags/newton-raphson/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Implied Volatility [Financial Engineering Programming #13]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/financial-engineering-13-implied-volatility/</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/financial-engineering-13-implied-volatility/</guid><description>Flip the BS formula backwards — plug in the real market price, leave σ blank, and whatever volatility makes it work? That&amp;rsquo;s implied volatility, baby.</description></item><item><title>Newton-Raphson Method [Financial Engineering Programming #15]</title><link>https://gdpark.blog/posts/financial-engineering-15-newton-raphson-method/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gdpark.blog/posts/financial-engineering-15-newton-raphson-method/</guid><description>We ditch bisection and let Newton-Raphson chase down implied volatility by hopping along tangent lines until it zeros in on the answer.</description></item></channel></rss>